Posts:
- Quantity: There seem to be a good amount of posts (34).
- Content: Good analysis, although I might suggest putting more depth/time into a few blogs. Some of the content in your blogs seems disjointed, see if you can connect the different ideas to make a cohesive whole both within individual blogs and using the blogs as a whole to support your argument.
- Format: The titles are all have something to do with Faulkner, they will mention his name or his works, but they could be more specific - like in"The Lighted Fools of The Sound and The Fury," you could perhaps preface it with Faulkner and Shakespeare, and then put your title.
- Good use of jump breaks.
Research:
- Thematic Focus: Nicely developing theme.
- Thesis & Cohesion: good use of linking to connect different posts to the thesis statement.
- Sources used in posts could be listed more obviously, and adding page numbers would be useful where applicable
- Sources: Sources Page looks good
Personal & Social:
- Author identity: Personality in the blogs - I might suggest trying to separate the blogs in which you are listing info on what you are planning to do and accomplishing, and the blogs where you analyze Shakespeare.
- Documentation of Process: Good job on documentation of your blog theme's 'evolution'
- Interactions: Also, good job with peer/social interactions (one example in your Night Letter to the Reader post).
Design:
- Appropriate to Theme: Great design on the blog. - if you put a few pictures on your blogs that might help to brighten it up a little and make the blogs look more interesting
- Side content: seems good, I didn't find it distracting, or wanting.
